Re: 50K record DELETE Begins, 100% CPU, Never Completes 1 hour later - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Clay Luther
Subject Re: 50K record DELETE Begins, 100% CPU, Never Completes 1 hour later
Date
Msg-id F67EB38120F7BB4BB972C786095802070E340A@ipcbu-exchange.amer.unity.cisco.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: 50K record DELETE Begins, 100% CPU, Never Completes 1 hour later  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
By 32K I meant:

sort_mem = 32768                        # min 64, size in KB

Do you mean to say that this should be

sort_mem = 33554432

?

Thanks.

cwl


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:00 PM
> To: Clay Luther
> Cc: Pgsql-General (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 50K record DELETE Begins, 100% CPU, Never
> Completes 1 hour later
>
>
> "Clay Luther" <claycle@cisco.com> writes:
> > Sort_mem is 32K.
>
> Try more (like 32M).  Particularly in 7.4, you can really
> hobble a query
> by starving it for sort memory (since that also determines whether
> hashtable techniques will be tried).
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 50K record DELETE Begins, 100% CPU, Never Completes 1 hour later
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 50K record DELETE Begins, 100% CPU, Never Completes 1 hour later