Re: Possible G2-item at SERIALIZABLE - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Andrey Borodin
Subject Re: Possible G2-item at SERIALIZABLE
Date
Msg-id F5F7F43D-A140-4596-98C5-94BD251BBC8C@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread
In response to Re: Possible G2-item at SERIALIZABLE  (Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>)
List pgsql-bugs

> On 3 Jun 2026, at 04:03, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com> wrote:
> 
> even an unused read should
> correctly abort for consistency

Yes, unused read is still a read. That makes sense.

Let's work towards fixes. I agree with your idea about introducing helpers
and tracking all cases where we need to DooM. Would you like to propose a
next patch version where you fix all know cases?


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #19519: REPACK can fail due to missing chunk for toast value
Next
From: Ayush Tiwari
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw:Re: Fw: gbt_var_consistent in contrib/btree_gist/btree_utils_var.c has internal-node type confusion on the <> strategy, bypassing exclusion constraints