On Jan 25, 2024, at 11:03, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I changed the preceding para to say "... check expressions are
> required in ...", which I thought was sufficient to cover that.
> Also, the tabular description of the operator tells you not to do it.
Yeah, that’s good. I was perhaps leaning into being over-explicit after it took me a while to even figure out that
therewas a difference, let alone where matters.
>> What do you think of also dropping the article from all the references to “the strict mode” or “the lax mode”, to
makethem “strict mode” and “lax mode”, respectively?
>
> Certainly most of 'em don't need it. I'll make it so.
Nice, thanks!
David
