On 16-Mar-08, at 2:19 AM, Justin wrote:
>
> I decided to reformat the raid 10 into ext2 to see if there was any
> real big difference in performance as some people have noted here
> is the test results
>
> please note the WAL files are still on the raid 0 set which is still
> in ext3 file system format. these test where run with the fsync as
> before. I made sure every thing was the same as with the first test.
>
This is opposite to the way I run things. I use ext2 on the WAL and
ext3 on the data. I'd also suggest RAID 10 on the WAL it is mostly
write.
Dave
