-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, November 16, 2007 09:16:54 +0000 Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> - --On Friday, November 16, 2007 08:51:54 +0000 Dave Page
>> <dpage@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>>>> Sure :) I was just trying to be alphabetical which is why i put ODBCng
>>>>> first (versus pgODBC).
>>>> That makes sense .. some sort of logical order would make it easier to find
>>>> things ...
>>> Except it then looks like we prefer the Command Prompt code over the
>>> community code.
>>
>> No, then it looks like its in alphabetical order ... *now* it looks like we
>> prefer one over the other, since there is no order to it ...
>
> We do - we prefer the community code over the one produced and maintained by
> a single company, and released under a licence that is potentially very
> restrictive (depending on the interpretation which has yet to be tested in
> court afaik).
Then that should be stated on the page to avoid confusion,w hat the ordering is
based on ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHPWNh4QvfyHIvDvMRAldpAJ0XzkUv25mLdGL1cJ0v8aWhVSUO6ACcDVKf
C7Vc7neUZfblTpe8J81GiJo=
=vU7o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
