On March 21, 2016 5:12:38 AM GMT+01:00, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>The article pointed by you justifies that the way ResetEvent is done by
>patch is correct. I am not sure, but you can weigh, if there is a need
>of
>comment so that if we want enhance this part of code (or want to write
>something similar) in future, we don't need to rediscover this fact.
I've added a reference in a comment.
Did you have a chance of running the patched versions on windows?
I plan to push this sometime today, so I can get on to some performance patches I was planning to look into
committing.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
