On May 1, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Henry B. Hotz wrote:
>>
>> On May 1, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>>> I would call them "gss" and "gss-sec". Or possibly "gss-enc". I
>>>> think
>>>> that's a lot more clear than "gss-np" (something ending with -
>>>> sec is a
>>>> giveaway)
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> If we settle on gss-np and gss-sec is that a good compromise?
>
> I still think the "-np" part is unclear - it's not "easily guessable
> without reading the documentation", unless you're already familiar
> with it.
>
> //Magnus
gss-noprot and gss-prot
gss-noenc and gss-enc
??
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu
