Re: libpqxx Large Objects - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Key88 SF
Subject Re: libpqxx Large Objects
Date
Msg-id F181CJLgRkQ9ZPWv1QJ000270f6@hotmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to libpqxx Large Objects  ("Key88 SF" <key88sf@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: libpqxx Large Objects
List pgsql-interfaces

Really? Where do you see that? I'm looking at the libpq - C library 
documentation, section 2, describing large objects. I don't see any  mention 
of the interface being deprecated.

-Dave




>From: "Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv@xs4all.nl>
>To: Key88 SF <key88sf@hotmail.com>
>CC: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
>Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] libpqxx Large Objects
>Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:30:29 +0100
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from mc2-f16.law16.hotmail.com ([65.54.237.23]) by 
>mc2-s5.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 8 Jan 
>2003 09:30:41 -0800
>Received: from relay2.pgsql.com ([64.49.215.143]) by 
>mc2-f16.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 8 Jan 
>2003 09:30:41 -0800
>Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])by 
>relay2.pgsql.com (Postfix) with ESMTPid 5C18BEE1718; Wed,  8 Jan 2003 
>12:30:32 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])by postgresql.org 
>(Postfix) with ESMTP id F3192475F34for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>; 
>Wed,  8 Jan 2003 12:30:28 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from mxzilla3.xs4all.nl (mxzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.49])by 
>postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115B5475EB2for 
><pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>; Wed,  8 Jan 2003 12:30:28 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from xs1.xs4all.nl (xs1.xs4all.nl [194.109.3.11])by 
>mxzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h08HUTbn061180;Wed, 8 Jan 
>2003 18:30:30 +0100 (CET)
>Received: (from jtv@localhost)by xs1.xs4all.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id 
>h08HUTk80001;Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:30:29 +0100 (CET)(envelope-from jtv)
>Message-ID: <20030108173029.GA62724@xs4all.nl>
>Mail-Followup-To: Key88 SF 
><key88sf@hotmail.com>,pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
>References: <F51y8sujox4HXYaXC6d00002a7f@hotmail.com>
>In-Reply-To: <F51y8sujox4HXYaXC6d00002a7f@hotmail.com>
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
>X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
>Precedence: bulk
>Sender: pgsql-interfaces-owner@postgresql.org
>Return-Path: pgsql-interfaces-owner+M3543@postgresql.org
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2003 17:30:41.0184 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[AA88CA00:01C2B73B]
>
>On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:00:07AM +0000, Key88 SF wrote:
> >
> > I was looking for support for Large Objects with libpqxx, but couldn't 
>find
> > anything special. Does that mean I need to use the libpq large-object
> > functions? Any plans for adding LO support in the future?
>
>AFAIK libpq's large object support is itself obsolete.  Documentation
>suggests the functionality has been integrated in regular tables.
>
>
>Jeroen
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Shouldn't .pgpass work with anything which uses libpq?
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: ODBC fix