RE: AW: Big 7.1 open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject RE: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Date
Msg-id EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJMEHBCCAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: AW: Big 7.1 open items  (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
Responses Re: AW: Big 7.1 open items
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> 
> > AFAIK,schema is independent from user in SQL92.
> > So default_tablespace_per_user doesn't necessarily imply
> > default_tablespace_per_schema.
> 
> Well, sombody must be interpreting this wrong, because 
> in Informix and Oracle the schema corresponds to the owner
> and they say they conform to ansi in this regard.

Is there really a schema:user=1:1 limitation in SQL-92 ?
Though both SQL-86 and SQL-89 had the limitation
SQL-92 removed it AFAIK.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Misc. consequences of backend memory management changes