RE: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject RE: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?
Date
Msg-id EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJAEBIEMAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses RE: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane
> 
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > I've been staring at the lock names for an hour now and the 
> best name I've
> > come up with is SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE, as in "share update, otherwise
> > exclusive" (the implication being that update would allow 
> select as well),
> > or some permutation thereof.
> 
> Okay with me, unless someone else comes up with a better idea...
> 

I have no better idea but I hope to leave VacuumLock as an alias
because I can't remember others.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andy Samuel"
Date:
Subject: Red Hat DB = PostgreSQL confirmed !
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2 stuff