Re: New Copy Formats - avro/orc/parquet - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: New Copy Formats - avro/orc/parquet
Date
Msg-id EF8C176E-03EA-4AD6-83FF-BCF5DBC76B20@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New Copy Formats - avro/orc/parquet  (Nicolas Paris <niparisco@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New Copy Formats - avro/orc/parquet
List pgsql-general

On February 11, 2018 12:00:12 PM PST, Nicolas Paris <niparisco@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > That is true, but the question is how significant the overhead is.
>If
>> > it's 50% then reducing it would make perfect sense. If it's 1% then
>no
>> > one if going to be bothered by it.
>>
>> I think it's pretty clear that it's going to be way way much more
>than
>> 1%.
>
>Good news but not sure to anderstand why.

I think you might have misunderstood my reply? I'm saying that going through PROGRAM will have significant overhead. I
can'tquite make sense of the rest of your reply otherwise? 

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Nicolas Paris
Date:
Subject: Re: New Copy Formats - avro/orc/parquet
Next
From: Nicolas Paris
Date:
Subject: Re: New Copy Formats - avro/orc/parquet