Re: [noreply@postgresql.org: coder] - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: [noreply@postgresql.org: coder]
Date
Msg-id EC5DE533-2C0E-4131-90C3-F318A6F9ED3C@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [noreply@postgresql.org: coder]  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-www

On Apr 4, 2018, at 7:05 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

On Tue, Apr  3, 2018 at 06:24:25PM -0300, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
David G. Johnston wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
wrote:

I would +1 modding the emails coming in
through this channel.  The volume is low
enough that it should not burden the mods.
And to help with any increase in volume,
I’m happy to help with the screening.

I won't object to additional moderation but it doesn't seem warranted at
this time.  I too think that at least some of the issues are form
presentation related and are on their way to being improved so things will
probably improve, and they aren't particular bad right now.

+1.  I do object, kinda -- surely we have better uses of Jonathan's time
:-) We used to moderate doc comments, and it was a terrible system …

Thanks for the concern.  If push comes to show, I find email moderation is an
O(1) operation, but yes could become O(n).


Agreed.  Let's first clarify the web page and see how much it fixes.

Please see attached screenshot in terms of the direction we're thinking.
Apologies for not having it as a diff, but the section of the code it lives in
would not produce an easy-to-read diff.

Jonathan

Attachment

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Mototaka Kanematsu
Date:
Subject: Re: Wiki editor request
Next
From: Mototaka Kanematsu
Date:
Subject: Re: Wiki editor request