Re: A little enhancement for hashdisk testset - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: A little enhancement for hashdisk testset
Date
Msg-id EBF6B21C-3883-4410-B20D-0420C7F1E920@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to A little enhancement for hashdisk testset  ("Hou, Zhijie" <houzj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 24 Sep 2020, at 07:45, Hou, Zhijie <houzj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> I found some tables is not dropped at the end of the sqlscript,
> It does not hava any problem, but I think it's better to drop the table in time.

There is value in keeping a representative set of objects around after
regression tests, as the database which is left after regression tests run is
used as the input to the pg_regress tests.  That being said, I don't think that
was the intention for these relationns in commit 92c58fd94801, but in general
we should avoid cleaning up too much to ensure that we stress pg_upgrade well
enough (there is a delicate balance to keep test runtime short as well of
course).

cheers ./daniel


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Katsuragi Yuta
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add features to pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: 回复:how to create index concurrently on partitioned table