On 3-Aug-06, at 6:14 PM, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> If that's the case then the driver is not doing what it's supposed
>> to be doing. It should be using the named portal (S_3) to do the
>> insert.
>
> No, the driver is fine. It is using a named statement (S_3) but an
> unnamed portal (because it is going to fetch all the data in one go
> and doesn't need to retain the portal after execution)
>
> If your query met the conditions for using a portal-based
> ResultSet, you'd see it use a named portal as well as a named
> statement.
Thanks for clarifying that Oliver, the logs are still misleading in
that they don't name the statement used in the bind message.
--dc--
>
> -O
>
