> On 4 Jun 2025, at 22:15, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> I tend think pg_upgrade should stick to checking things that are necessary for the upgrade to succeed. It shouldn't
startbeing an interactive portal to the release notes for aspects that are merely recommendations.
Agreed, I was going to support this warning but this comment convinced me
otherwise. pg_upgrade is messy as it is without tasking it with more usecases.
--
Daniel Gustafsson