Re: EnterpriseDB on sponsors page - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Dave Page
Subject Re: EnterpriseDB on sponsors page
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7EBD5@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to EnterpriseDB on sponsors page  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
> Sent: 22 December 2005 00:32
> To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: [pgsql-www] EnterpriseDB on sponsors page
>
> Folks,
>
> EnterpriseDB would like to be listed on the "postgresql
> sponsors" page.
>   Their credentials are:
>
> -- Employed Alvaro for 3 months exclusively to complete
> shared locks for
> 8.1.
>
> -- Paid for, and devoted staff time to, Coverity testing of
> PostgreSQL
> 8.0 and the subsequent bug fixes.
>
> -- Ported the JasperSoft dashboard to PostgreSQL (
> http://www.oetrends.com/news.php?action=view_record&idnum=498
> ) and are
> porting SugarCRM (release early 2006).
>
> -- Provided booth space and swag at Linux World Expo 2005
>
> -- are helping with legal fees for our trademark issues.
>
> -- plan to make ongoing code contributions based on their work on eDB.
>
>
> This is the first time, I think, we've talked about someone who's not
> employing a full-time developer or giving us web servers right now.
> However, they have contributed a bunch of other "stuff" and
> plan to keep
> on doing so.
>
> Discussion?

The have also given pgAdmin more sponsorship than anyone else ever has.
I certainly think they should be included as they are clearly supporting
PostgreSQL and related projects in many non-trivial ways. Just because
it is not a single big item like a server or FT developer we should
should not exclude them

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] Offline for Christmas ...
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB on sponsors page