> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claudio Natoli [mailto:claudio.natoli@memetrics.com]
> Sent: 17 June 2004 02:00
> To: Dave Page; Claudio Natoli; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCHES] pg_ctl service integration for WIN32
>
>
> Dave Page writes:
> > Looks OK to me at a quick glance. One thought though, whilst I like
> > the idea of using service pause to do a SIGHUP from a convenience
> > point of view, it's not exactly the expected behaviour and
> might leave
> > the inexperienced user wondering why the server is still
> running normally.
> > I'm on the fence regarding which way to to go with that though...
>
> Likewise, I have no strong feelings either way. Apparently it
> is an accepted paradigm.
Fair enough - in which case let's keep it and document it someplace.
It'll definitely be handy for those that know about it.
> Subconsciously, I must be against it, as I failed to pass a
> flag to enable the Pause/SIGHUP operation. :-)
:-)
Regards, Dave.