Re: DBSize backend integration - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: DBSize backend integration
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490E71A@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to DBSize backend integration  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: DBSize backend integration
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 24 June 2005 20:45
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DBSize backend integration
>
> > My personal view is that pg_database_size, pg_relation_size and
> > pg_tablespace_size, as well as pg_size_pretty should be included. If
> > others consider that the by name versions are also useful, then they
> > should be included, but renamed for consistency. The other three
> > functions should be dropped IMO.
>
> So drop total_relation_size(), relation_size_components(), and what
> else?

indexes_size()

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Server instrumentation patch
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: DBSize backend integration