Re: Remote administration contrib module - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Remote administration contrib module
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E485087D@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Remote administration contrib module  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Remote administration contrib module
List pgsql-hackers


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net]
Sent: Mon 3/27/2006 3:00 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Dave Page
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Remote administration contrib module
Am Montag, 27. März 2006 15:12 schrieb Dave Page:
> > So, how would people feel about including this as
> > a contrib module in the future, until(/if) equivalent functionality
> > becomes available in -core in some form?
>
> Right now you have got plenty of time to get it in shape for inclusion in
> core, so we might not even have to take the detour through a contrib module.

As it stands it was previously rejected for inclusion in -core in it's current form. The main objector was Tom, but as
itwas him that encouraged me to change the licencing for inclusion as a contrib module I assume he doesn't object to
that.

I have submitted a conference discussion proposal to talk about ways of implementing the remote configuration that we
wantwhich was the main thing I think Tom objected to originally, but that's some time away and would likely result in a
significantlymore complex solution that may or may not get done for 8.2. In addition, there are one or two helper
functionsin there that were previously rejected more on the 'no use to end user' basis iirc (see pg_logdir_ls) which
maynever end up in -core without reconsideration of the need. It would be good (for us at least) to get it in as a
contrib,even if we do manage to replace it, or some of it, by release. 

Regards, Dave



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Remote administration contrib module
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PANIC: heap_update_redo: no block