> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian G. Pflug [mailto:fgp@phlo.org]
> Sent: 11 April 2005 13:18
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: OpenMacNews; pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] close-but-not-quite w/
> pgadmin3.app on osx 10.3.8
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >>Heres the problem - the executable should be named PgAdminIII, not
> >
> >
> > Don't mess with the branding!! :-)
> >
> > Can that be made 'pgAdmin3' please? The long form is
> 'pgAdmin III', with
> > the space. Never an uppercase P though.
> Well, the executable inside the bundle is practically invisble to the
> user anway, so I guess you want the whole bundle to be
> renamed... (I don't
> know if it's possible to name the main executable different
> than the bundle -
> I guess you can do it by specifying the executable name in
> the plist file, but
> there is not much point in this, since the executable name is
> hidden from the
> user anyway ;-) ).
>
> I can do that, but first I'd like to know if the current
> patch + my addition
> from today makes things work for OpenMacNews. If this works,
> I'll prepare
> a new Version of the patch with the bundle renamed. If not,
> I'd like to fix
> all remaining problems before introducing new breakage by
> renaming things...
>
> Which name do you prefer? I'd prefer "pgAdmin III", since it
> just looks
> prettier - but if the space in the bundle name causes
> problems, I'll go
> with pgAdmin3, if there are no objections.
Sounds good to me :-)
I'll remove your last patch from my queue then and look out for a
replacement.
Thanks, Dave.
