Re: Going for Gold - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Going for Gold
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527B98@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Going for Gold  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Responses Re: Going for Gold  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
List pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Andreas Pflug
> Sent: 29 November 2004 10:24
> To: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Going for Gold
>
> Hi friends,
>
> seems pgAdmin III 1.2RC is matured, should we make it Gold
> now? Tom Lane promised to avoid further changes to the pgsql
> system schema, so hopefully we won't face similar problems as
> with beta4->beta5 again.
>
> As soon as pgsql8.0 is out, we can roll 1.2.1 to update the
> documentation to the release version, but we shouldn't delay
> 1.2.0 for it.

Sounds good to me. Are the docs/screenshots/pg docs etc up to date?

I can probably roll it tomorrow.... (following which I'll branch for
-patches)

/D

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Troels Arvin
Date:
Subject: Re: Going for Gold
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Going for Gold