Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306882@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 02 October 2004 19:23
> To: Peter Eisentraut
> Cc: Bruno Wolff III; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Mislabeled timestamp functions (was
> Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)
>
> > I'd prefer if all users of 8.0 were guaranteed to have the
> same catalog.
>
> Well, there's something to be said for that viewpoint too.
> Anyone else feel the same?

It makes sense to me. Especially with hordes of win32 newbies gathering
at the door it'll be one less variable to think about.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd