Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154CD3A@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com]
> Sent: 15 September 2006 18:40
> To: Magnus Hagander
> Cc: Joshua D. Drake; Peter Eisentraut;
> pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Status of funds.postgresql.org?
>
> Magnus,
>
> Look, it's pretty simple. Members of the Funds Group want to
> manage our
> own web stuff.  We find that the www.postgresql.org system doesn't
> provide us with the features we need to manage our own stuff
> easily, and
> that other systems (e.g. Framewerk) do.
>
> We did the same for conference.postgresql.org, and it worked great.
>
> I really don't see why every request for web stuff needs to become a
> turf battle.

It's not a turf battle - it's about the fact that a number of years ago,
it was agreed that we would consolidate and merge all the subsites that
had sprung up whereever reasonable to do so. That's why advocacy went,
why developer went, why odbc went, and why techdocs is in the process of
going. Anyone who has worked hard towards that aim, or just agreed with
the strategy is naturally going to want some seriously good
justification to backtrack and create another new site in the
postgresql.org domain.

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?