Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors)
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154C7A2@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors)  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Treat
> Sent: 23 August 2006 04:16
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Tom Lane
> Subject: Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [HACKERS]
> [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors)
>
> I've always been
> quite amazed how much email some of the folks here manage to
> process... I
> suppose I could just chalk it up to a pine vs. gui thing, but
> I suspect there
> are some other tricks people have to make emails more
> manageable (anyone
> combine all pg mail to one folder?)

More or less - one for -www, webmaster and slaves stuff, and another for
-odbc, -hackers, -patches, -committers, -perform, -general and so on. I
do keep additional ones for FG and -core though. Everything is
auto-filtered at our Exchange server so it's organised as I like whether
I pick it up on PDA, webmail, PC or Mac.

Regards, Dave.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Enum proposal / design
Next
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Problem with mailing list?