Re: the integer type - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dave Page
Subject Re: the integer type
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9CCE@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to the integer type  ("Zahir Lalani" <zahir@systemz.net>)
List pgsql-general

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net]
> Sent: 17 April 2006 20:16
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Cc: Dave Page; Tony Caduto; chris smith; Zahir Lalani
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] the integer type
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> > > It's not a error, pgAdmin III simply does not display the word
> > > integer in it's drop down comboboxes, it uses all the internal
> > > representation of types not the SQL standard aliases.
> >
> > Which allows you to use any custom datatype or domain that you like.
>
> That is completely unrelated. If pgadmin (or any tool)
> passed the data types it presumably fetches from pg_type or
> thereabouts through the format_type function it could present
> the user with a full list of actually available data types
> but in their preferred spellings.

It's not at all unrelated - it just means that none of us were aware of
the existance of format_type.

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Yudie Pg"
Date:
Subject: tsearch partial word
Next
From: Tony Caduto
Date:
Subject: Re: the integer type