Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Date
Msg-id E6DB1517-22A9-4163-B15E-3AD778673D55@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
List pgsql-hackers
On Sep 8, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> If you don't want any constraints at all on the argument types, you
> can use "any" (with the quotes, because it's a reserved word :-().
> If you want some constraints but not "anyelement", please be more
> specific about what you want.

Oooh, I need to try that. How far back does that behavior go,  
compatibility-wise?

Best,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types