Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ogden
Subject Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++
Date
Msg-id E6229A9F-876F-4604-900A-EC93C5B720AB@darkstatic.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++  ("ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu>)
Responses Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++
List pgsql-performance
On Aug 17, 2011, at 1:31 PM, ktm@rice.edu wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:26:56PM -0500, Ogden wrote:
>> I am using bonnie++ to benchmark our current Postgres system (on RAID 5) with the new one we have, which I have
configuredwith RAID 10. The drives are the same (SAS 15K). I tried the new system with ext3 and then XFS but the
resultsseem really outrageous as compared to the current system, or am I reading things wrong? 
>>
>> The benchmark results are here:
>>
>> http://malekkoheavyindustry.com/benchmark.html
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Ogden
>
> That looks pretty normal to me.
>
> Ken

But such a jump from the current db01 system to this? Over 20 times difference from the current system to the new one
withXFS. Is that much of a jump normal? 

Ogden

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "ktm@rice.edu"
Date:
Subject: Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++
Next
From: "ktm@rice.edu"
Date:
Subject: Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++