From: "Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
>>> Thanks! The patch looks good to me. Attached is the updated version of
>>> the patch. I added the comments.
Thank you very much. Your comment looks great. I tested some recovery
situations, and confirmed that WAL segments were kept/removed as intended.
I'll update the CommitFest entry with this patch.
> <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
>> Sorry for reacting so slowly, but I'm not sure I like this patch. It's a
>> quite useful property that all the WAL files that are needed for recovery
>> are copied into pg_xlog, even when restoring from archive, even when not
>> doing cascading replication. It guarantees that you can restart the
>> standby,
>> even if the connection to the archive is lost for some reason. I
>> intentionally changed the behavior for archive recovery too, when it was
>> introduced for cascading replication. Also, I think it's good that the
>> behavior does not depend on whether cascading replication is enabled -
>> it's
>> a quite subtle difference.
>>
>> So, IMHO this is not a bug, it's a feature.
>
> Yep.
I understood the benefit for the standby recovery.
>> To solve the original problem of running out of disk space in archive
>> recovery, I wonder if we should perform restartpoints more aggressively.
>> We
>> intentionally don't trigger restatpoings by checkpoint_segments, only
>> checkpoint_timeout, but I wonder if there should be an option for that.
>
> That's an option.
>
>> MauMau, did you try simply reducing checkpoint_timeout, while doing
>> recovery?
>
> The problem is, we might not be able to perform restartpoints more
> aggressively
> even if we reduce checkpoint_timeout in the server under the archive
> recovery.
> Because the frequency of occurrence of restartpoints depends on not only
> that
> checkpoint_timeout but also the checkpoints which happened while the
> server
> was running.
I haven't tried reducing checkpoint_timeout. I think we cannot take that
approach, because we cannot suggest appropriate checkpoint_timeout to users.
That is, what checkpoint_timeout setting can we suggest so that WAL doesn't
accumulate in pg_xlog/ more than 9.1?
In addition, as Fujii-san said, it doesn't seem we can restartpoint
completely. Plus, if we can cause restartpoints frequently, the recovery
would take (much?) longer, because shared buffers are flushed more
frequently.
So, how about just removing AllowCascadeReplication() condition from the
patch? That allows WAL to accumulate in pg_xlog/ during standby recovery
but not during archive recovery.
Regards
MauMau
