Thanks for the feedback. It sounds like NFS is a viable solution nowadays. I a still going to shoot for using iSCSI,
givenit is a block-level protocol rather than file-level, it seems to me it would be better suited to database I/O.
On Feb 14, 2011, at 2:07 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Bryan Keller <bryanck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS via NFS. I have read a few things on the Web
sayingthis is not recommended, as it will be slow and could potentially cause data corruption.
>
> Its not recommended if you have a crap NFS implementation. I think it
> was about 10 years ago I ran Oracle under Solaris with a Netapp for
> storage. Rock solid, supported configuration, and actually
> outperformed using local disk. Hopefully the open source NFS clients
> have caught up by now - if you see problem reports or recommendations,
> pay attention to the platform and implementation rather than the
> protocol.
>
>
> --
> Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net>
> http://www.stuartbishop.net/
