On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> It's already centralized on pgFoundry. What's the difference?
>
> I kinda think given the different usecases of the core lists and external ones as well as the huge setup differences
(mj2vs mailman for example) it would make more sense to let those go as well because migration will be at least as
complexas guiding people to other services.
I don't mean use the core mailman. I mean have a separate projects mailman, which is exactly what pgf does. Hell, one
couldkeep using the exact domains and lists now with no significant downtime, even if pgf went away.
> well I can easily imagine that putting a (hopefully powerful) search on top of that aggregator and being able to
searchdata we already have (in the wiki database or pgf itself) seems logical.
That would be reason to have a central system for release distribution and documentation management. I've got some
ideasabout that I'll post later, under a different subject.
Best,
David
