Re: generate_series() Interpretation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: generate_series() Interpretation
Date
Msg-id E472FE99-31AE-4DC7-BE9A-EB9883BF39AE@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: generate_series() Interpretation  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:

> It is precisely to support such fancy things that some products
> support a more abstract date type which allows 31 days in any month,
> and then normalizes to real dates as needed.  The PostgreSQL
> developer community has generally not been receptive to such use
> cases.  I think you need to iterate through month intervals and add
> those to the starting date for now.  If you want to start with the
> last day of a month with less than 31 days, you may need to back up
> a month or two to find a suitable month and offset your intervals by
> the appropriate number of months.
>
> I'd bet that if you encapsulate all that in a PostgreSQL function,
> you're not the only one who would find it useful.

Yeah, did that a while ago:
 http://www.justatheory.com/computers/databases/postgresql/recurring_events.html

I think it could be simpler now, with generate_series() for some intervals.

Best,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: per-column generic option
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Commitfest 2001-06: 10 days in