pgsql: Improve wording of some pg_upgrade failure reports. - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Tom Lane
Subject pgsql: Improve wording of some pg_upgrade failure reports.
Date
Msg-id E1lcCWf-0008S3-RE@gemulon.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: pgsql: Improve wording of some pg_upgrade failure reports.
List pgsql-committers
Improve wording of some pg_upgrade failure reports.

Don't advocate dropping a whole table when dropping a column would
serve.  While at it, try to make the layout of these messages a
bit cleaner and more consistent.

Per suggestion from Daniel Gustafsson.  No back-patch, as we generally
don't like to churn translatable messages in released branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2798740.1619622555@sss.pgh.pa.us

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c9c37ae03fea0c8ad467392ddf03940b61974935

Modified Files
--------------
src/bin/pg_upgrade/check.c   | 10 +++++-----
src/bin/pg_upgrade/version.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Fix some more omissions in pg_upgrade's tests for non-upgradable
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Another try to fix the test case added by commit f5fc2f5b23.