pgsql: Fix thinko in lock mode enum - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject pgsql: Fix thinko in lock mode enum
Date
Msg-id E1Y7qWw-0003nN-Vn@gemulon.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
Fix thinko in lock mode enum

Commit 0e5680f4737a9c6aa94aa9e77543e5de60411322 contained a thinko
mixing LOCKMODE with LockTupleMode.  This caused misbehavior in the case
where a tuple is marked with a multixact with at most a FOR SHARE lock,
and another transaction tries to acquire a FOR NO KEY EXCLUSIVE lock;
this case should block but doesn't.

Include a new isolation tester spec file to explicitely try all the
tuple lock combinations; without the fix it shows the problem:

    starting permutation: s1_begin s1_lcksvpt s1_tuplock2 s2_tuplock3 s1_commit
    step s1_begin: BEGIN;
    step s1_lcksvpt: SELECT * FROM multixact_conflict FOR KEY SHARE; SAVEPOINT foo;
    a

    1
    step s1_tuplock2: SELECT * FROM multixact_conflict FOR SHARE;
    a

    1
    step s2_tuplock3: SELECT * FROM multixact_conflict FOR NO KEY UPDATE;
    a

    1
    step s1_commit: COMMIT;

With the fixed code, step s2_tuplock3 blocks until session 1 commits,
which is the correct behavior.

All other cases behave correctly.

Backpatch to 9.3, like the commit that introduced the problem.

Branch
------
REL9_3_STABLE

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/54a8abc2b7d150ae7e2738f4b0e687fd9cd9011a

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c                   |    6 +-
src/test/isolation/expected/tuplelock-conflict.out |  469 ++++++++++++++++++++
src/test/isolation/isolation_schedule              |    1 +
src/test/isolation/specs/tuplelock-conflict.spec   |   63 +++
4 files changed, 537 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Fix thinko in lock mode enum
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Fix thinko in lock mode enum