pgsql: "Pin", rather than "keep", dynamic shared memory mappings and se - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Robert Haas
Subject pgsql: "Pin", rather than "keep", dynamic shared memory mappings and se
Date
Msg-id E1Xjrz0-0002KE-JH@gemulon.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
"Pin", rather than "keep", dynamic shared memory mappings and segments.

Nobody seemed concerned about this naming when it originally went in,
but there's a pending patch that implements the opposite of
dsm_keep_mapping, and the term "unkeep" was judged unpalatable.
"unpin" has existing precedent in the PostgreSQL code base, and the
English language, so use this terminology instead.

Per discussion, back-patch to 9.4.

Branch
------
REL9_4_STABLE

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/1c49dae165bcee69bf3327d6ae20271d82cdf6bf

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm.c      |   10 +++++-----
src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm_impl.c |    2 +-
src/include/storage/dsm.h          |    4 ++--
src/include/storage/dsm_impl.h     |    2 +-
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: pgsql: "Pin", rather than "keep", dynamic shared memory mappings and se
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Test IsInTransactionChain, not IsTransactionBlock, in vac_update