Fix typo in freeze_table_age implementation
The original code used freeze_min_age instead of freeze_table_age. The
main consequence of this mistake is that lowering freeze_min_age would
cause full-table scans to occur much more frequently, which causes
serious issues because the number of writes required is much larger.
That feature (freeze_min_age) is supposed to affect only how soon tuples
are frozen; some pages should still be skipped due to the visibility
map.
Backpatch to 8.4, where the freeze_table_age feature was introduced.
Report and patch from Andres Freund
Branch
------
REL9_2_STABLE
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/231dbb3c9be755eebdf677b469f2dd4494e7937f
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/commands/vacuum.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
