On Feb 15, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Yeah, that bug is fixed with the attached, though I am rethinking this
>> bit.
>
> I am thinking that the statute of limitations has expired on this
> patch, and that we should mark it Returned with Feedback and continue
> working on it for 9.2. I know it's a valuable feature, but I think
> we're out of time.
How is such a determination made, exactly?
Best,
David
