> A nice improvement on that would be to have a "rearchive_command" to
> allow to sync the new bytes written since a previous archive_command
(so
> it needs a new placeholder "start from this byte"). This allows
writing
> dd seek=%s skip=%s count=%b bs=1
But after a log switch nothing is filling that rest anymore.
Maybe this goes too much in the direction of a "streaming the log"
implementation,
which is imho better suited to ship transactions somewhere else as soon
as possible.
Andreas
