Re: HOT pgbench results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
Subject Re: HOT pgbench results
Date
Msg-id E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA5790242290C@m0143.s-mxs.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HOT pgbench results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> >         unpatched    HOT
> > autovacuums    116        43
> > autoanalyzes    139        60
>
> > HOT greatly reduces the number of vacuums needed. That's
> good, that's
> > where the gains in throughput in longer I/O bound runs comes from.
>
> But surely failing to auto-analyze after a HOT update is a bad thing.

Well, the definition is that no index columns changed, so this seems
debateable.
It seems for OLTP you should not need an analyze, but for DSS filtering
or joining
on non indexed columns you would. And that would also only be relevant
if you created
custom statistics on non indexed columns.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: More logging for autovacuum
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: More logging for autovacuum