Re: Operator class group proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
Subject Re: Operator class group proposal
Date
Msg-id E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA5790198F2D4@m0143.s-mxs.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Operator class group proposal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Operator class group proposal
List pgsql-hackers
> pg_opfamily
>
>     OID
>     opfamid            access method OID
>     opfname            family name
>     opfnamespace        family namespace
>     opfowner        owner's OID
>
> But "opfamid" is a really unfortunate name, because it looks way too
> much like it's supposed to be the ID of the family itself, rather than
> of the index AM it's associated with.

I think by convention it is clear that we are talking about opf -- amid,
opfmethod imho removes the connex to amid so I wouldn't do it.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_am.amstrategies should be 0 when not meaningful?
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: quoting problem