Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bossart, Nathan
Subject Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
Date
Msg-id E053E257-E99F-46A6-B2EF-C0E4BB1F6398@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 1/11/22, 10:06 AM, "John Naylor" <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I pushed this with one small change -- I felt the comment didn't need
> to explain the warning message, since it now simply matches the coding
> more exactly. Also, v5 was a big enough change from v4 that I put
> Nathan as the first author.

Thanks!

Nathan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: fix crash with Python 3.11