On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 04:34 PM, David Walker wrote:
> Does this mean that in the future '342' may not be valid as an insert
> into a
> numeric field and that we should be using 342 instead?
I didn't see an answer to this question, but I sincerely hope that the
answer is
"no." Otherwise, dynamic interfaces are going to have a much harder
time.
Take DBI (and DBD::Pg), for example. Most DBI users don't specify a
data type when using placeholders. Therefore, DBD::Pg (and other DBDs,
including DBD::Oracle) assume that the data types are strings. So it's
not unusual for DBD::Pg to execute a query like this:
INSERT INTO foo (numtype, varchartype, datetime, inttype) VALUES ('23.4', 'string', '2002-11-30 00:00:00',
'12');
In order to allow the flexibility to remain, AFAICT PostgreSQL has to
continue to allow strings to be converted to numbers on the back end.
Regards,
David
--
David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory
david@wheeler.net ICQ: 15726394
http://david.wheeler.net/ Yahoo!: dew7e Jabber:
Theory@jabber.org
