RE: Query Spins - Mailing list pgsql-admin
From | Murthy Nunna |
---|---|
Subject | RE: Query Spins |
Date | |
Msg-id | DM8PR09MB6677162796A489508243437EB803A@DM8PR09MB6677.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Query Spins (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
List | pgsql-admin |
More information.... 1) At 5:30pm, the query is fired 5 times from a client 2) 4 of them finished. One stuck (spins - takes CPU) 3) The underlying tables are pretty big and dynamic. But I have been running autovacuum and analyze aggressively at tablelevel. 4) max_parallel_workers and max_worker_processes are both set to 8. I collected following info just a little after 5:30pm after all 5 queries have fired. ps -aef | grep postgres | grep worker postgres 2162504 1802555 99 17:30 ? 00:00:04 postgres: parallel worker for PID 2162501 postgres 2162505 1802555 99 17:30 ? 00:00:04 postgres: parallel worker for PID 2162501 postgres 2162506 1802555 99 17:30 ? 00:00:04 postgres: parallel worker for PID 2162502 postgres 2162507 1802555 99 17:30 ? 00:00:04 postgres: parallel worker for PID 2162502 postgres 2162508 1802555 99 17:30 ? 00:00:04 postgres: parallel worker for PID 2162503 postgres 2162509 1802555 99 17:30 ? 00:00:04 postgres: parallel worker for PID 2162503 postgres 2162827 1802555 99 17:30 ? 00:00:03 postgres: parallel worker for PID 2162703 It is almost certain that max_parallel_workers have exhausted. So, what? The remaining query should not get stuck! The stuck query leader PID is 2162502. The parallel workers of this PID 2162502 are long gone. ps -aef | grep 2162506 | grep -v grep ps -aef | grep 2162507 | grep -v grep Following is from pg_stat_activity: pid | 2162502 client_port | 37264 xact_start | 2025-09-04 17:30 query_start | 2025-09-04 17:30 state_change | 2025-09-04 17:30 wait_event | state | active now | 2025-09-04 20:10 time_runnning | 02:40:00.509246 Interesting part is, temp file... last change timestamp changes but file size doesn't. File pgsql_tmp2162502.1 has been at242155520 bytes for a long time but the last change time stamp keeps changing. ls -ltr base/pgsql_tmp/ total 277864 -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16359424 Sep 4 17:30 pgsql_tmp2162502.0 -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 242155520 Sep 4 20:21 pgsql_tmp2162502.1 -----Original Message----- From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> Sent: Monday, September 1, 2025 2:52 AM To: Murthy Nunna <mnunna@fnal.gov>; pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Query Spins [EXTERNAL] – This message is from an external sender On Mon, 2025-09-01 at 03:52 +0000, Murthy Nunna wrote: > Pg16.10 > > I have a query which runs fine most of the time. When it runs fine, it > spawns parallel workers. In pg_stat_activity, wait_event is blank, > state is active and backend_type = "client backend" for the main > query. For parallel workers of this query I see wait_event = > MessageQueueSend, state is active and backend_type = "parallel worker" > > But some times, it has no parallel workers. wait_event is blank, state > is active and backend_type =client backend. And it never ends. It takes up lot of CPU. > The socket on both server and client server are in ESTABLISHED state > (netstat -tulpa | grep <client_port>). Perhaps no workers are spawned because "max_parallel_workers" has already been exhausted by other backends. Check for thenumber of concurrent parallel workers next time you get the error. I cannot know the source of your performance problems, but perhaps it is a combination of system overload and lack of availableparallel worker processes, which might well go together. Yours, Laurenz Albe
pgsql-admin by date: