On May 31, 2008, at 09:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 1. Most people have no idea how to set these.
>> 2. The current postgresql.conf file is a huge mess of 194 options,
>> the
>> vast majority of which most users will never touch.
>> 3. GUCS lists are kept in 3 different places (guc.c, postgresql.conf,
>> and the settings.sgml), which are only synched with each other
>> manually.
>> 4. We don't seem to be getting any closer to autotuning.
>
> The proposal doesn't actually solve any of those problems.
It solves #2 at least.
> I disagree with doing any of this. It doesn't result in any useful
> reduction in maintenance effort, and what it does do is make it
> impossible to keep control over the detailed layout, formatting,
> commenting etc in a sample postgresql.conf. Nor do I think that
> "generate a whole config file from scratch" is going to be a useful
> behavior for tuning problems --- how will you merge it with what
> you had before?
I'd love to see these issues resolved. The current postgresql.conf is
way over the top. Might you have a better idea?
Thanks,
David
