Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Brusser
Subject Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?
Date
Msg-id DEEIJKLFNJGBEMBLBAHCKEJLDMAA.michael@synchronicity.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?
Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?
List pgsql-hackers
Yes, we use NFS. Many of our customers use it as well.
Mike.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
... ...
> Michael Brusser <michael@synchronicity.com> writes:
> > 2003-10-10 22:37:05 ERROR:  cannot read block 0 of s_noteimportlinks:
> > Interrupted system call
> 
> Hmm.  I found this hard to believe at first, but indeed my local man
> pages for read() and write() say they can return EINTR if interrupted
> by a signal.  This may depend on the filesystem in use (are you using
> NFS?)
> 
> We had probably better fix fd.c to retry on EINTR.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Brusser
Date:
Subject: feature request
Next
From: bbadour@golden.net (Bob Badour)
Date:
Subject: Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL