On Nov 12, 2004, at 8:24 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> [Top-posting fixed]
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:06:08AM -0500, Goutam Paruchuri wrote:
>
>> Scott Frankel wrote:
>>
>>> ORDER BY DESC LIMIT 1 is much simpler and more readable than a
>>> sub-query. Though the sub-query approach looks to be a good template
>>> for ensuring more accurate results by being more explicit.
>
> Scott, how would a subquery "ensure more accurate results by being
> more explicit"?
>
Good question. I'm just now starting to construct sub-queries.
Perhaps naively,
I assumed that setting g.date explicitly equal to the results of a MAX
function
would return more reliable results than limiting a return list to just
the first value
listed. Though it's entirely possible that both approaches use the
same logic
under the hood.
Nonetheless, I'm using the DESC LIMIT 1 approach for now as it yields
the
results I need and is much more readable.
Thanks again!
Scott
