Re: CoC [Final v2] - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: CoC [Final v2]
Date
Msg-id DE1EB4AE-6B17-4D17-ADB0-221EE8049BCF@justatheory.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CoC [Final v2]  (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>)
Responses Re: CoC [Final v2]  (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Jan 24, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com> wrote:

> What is missing from this, first and foremost, is a reporting and resolution mechanism.  If someone feels the CoC has
beenviolated, who do they talk to?  How does that person or entity resolve things?  What confidentiality promises are
made?

I think that’s planned for a separate document, to be linked. But it need to be put in place at the same time, IME.
Otherwisethe CoC on its own has no teeth. 

Best,

David


Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: CoC [Final v2]
Next
From: Christophe Pettus
Date:
Subject: Re: CoC [Final v2]