On Thu Sep 4, 2025 at 8:02 PM -03, Rishu Bagga wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 7:14 AM Arseniy Mukhin
> <arseniy.mukhin.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Interesting, have you shared your patch and results somewhere? IIUC
>> Tom's approach resolves this bug, because with it we have queue
>> entries produced by committed transactions only, so we don't need to
>> check their status and don't have dependency on clog.
>
> I was eventually able to get better numbers with the patch after using
> a substantial number of connections, so I have now posted it here. [1].
>
Thanks for sharing the patch! I'll reserve some time to test and review.
--
Matheus Alcantara