On Nov 14, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It's fairly unscientific and inconclusive, and the discussion seems to have died. I think since Tom and I did most of
thework on this our voices should count a little louder :-) , so I'm going to go with his suggestion of VALUE, unless
thereare loud squawks.
+1
Maybe update the doc mentions of "label," then.
David
