Re: [DOCS] [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Decibel!
Subject Re: [DOCS] [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax
Date
Msg-id DC2E01D0-D702-4BB7-99AB-E6BA2900C87A@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> There's already some changes needed in this area needed to
>>> execute the
>>> full GUC cleanup/wizard plan that's being worked on.  The
>>> pg_settings view
>>> really should show the value both as the user input it and as
>>> it's stored
>>> internally for cases like these, which lowers the confusion here
>>> a bit
>>> even without going so far as converting everything to bytes.
>>
>> Is this a TODO?
>
> I don't think you need yet another TODO for every detail, the
> existing TODO "Add external tool to auto-tune some postgresql.conf
> parameters" has to squash a bunch of issues in this area.  This
> particular issue Greg raised will already be improved significantly
> if executing the larger project plan at http://wiki.postgresql.org/
> wiki/GUCS_Overhaul


Yeah, but OTOH it's not clear at all when we might see such a tool,
while clarifying this stuff would help people immediately... I think
a TODO would be good to make sure this doesn't fall through the cracks.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal sql: labeled function params
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Surprising syntax error