Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From J. Andrew Rogers
Subject Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing
Date
Msg-id D986D872-2CE4-4D12-B368-2F4494CFE08B@neopolitan.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing  ("Milen Kulev" <makulev@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing
List pgsql-performance
On Aug 1, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Milen Kulev wrote:
> Is anyone using XFS for storing/retrieving relatively large amount
> of data  (~ 200GB)?


Yes, we've been using it on Linux since v2.4 (currently v2.6) and it
has been rock solid on our database servers (Opterons, running in
both 32-bit and 64-bit mode).  Our databases are not quite 200GB
(maybe 75GB for a big one currently), but ballpark enough that the
experience is probably valid.  We also have a few terabyte+ non-
database XFS file servers too.

Performance has been very good even with nearly full file systems,
and reliability has been perfect so far. Some of those file systems
get used pretty hard for months or years non-stop.  Comparatively, I
can only tell you that XFS tends to be significantly faster than
Ext3, but we never did any serious file system tuning either.

Knowing nothing else, my experience would suggest that XFS is a fine
and safe choice for your application.


J. Andrew Rogers


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: H Hale
Date:
Subject: Re: sub select performance due to seq scans
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing